S.R.Raja v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.30132 of 2013 S.R.Raja ...

Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, At Kancheepuram.

2.The Block Development Officer, Maduranthagam Panchayat Union, Maduranthagam Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

...

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 13.05.2013 and thereby direct the second respondent to furnish the certified copies of the public documents as requested by the petitioner in the above said representation dated 13.05.2013 by receiving appropriate charges towards the same immediately.

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.S.Selvam Government Advocate

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 23.01.2020, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rli/ah https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, At Kancheepuram.

2.The Block Development Officer, Maduranthagam Panchayat Union, Maduranthagam Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

+1cc to Government Pleader, SR.No.7701.

W.P. No.30132 of 2013 VG I(CO) CSR: 02.03.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/