D.Dhanapal v. The District Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.34477 of 2012 D.Dhanapal ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Registrar, (Administrator), Central Chennai, Chennai - 600 014.

2.The Joint Sub-Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Central Chennai, Chennai - 600 014.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the proceedings of the first respondent No.9640/A1/2012, dated 13.08.2012 and quash the same and direct the second respondent to register the sale agreement, dated 02.04.2012. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, Government Advocate.

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e., on 04.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

klt To 1.The District Registrar, (Administrator), Central Chennai, Chennai - 600 014.

2.The Joint Sub-Registrar, Office of the District Registrar, Central Chennai, Chennai - 600 014.

+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 104049 W.P. No.34477 of 2012 A.SK(07/02/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/