M.D.Ameerunissa v. The Tamilnadu Electricity
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.11.2021 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.30243 and 30139 of 2013 1.M.D.Ameerunissa ... Petitioner (in W.P.No.30243 of 2013) 2.U.Firose Beevi, ... Petitioner (in W.P.No.30139 of 2013) Vs.
1.The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Represented by its Chairman, Anna Salai, Chennai.
2.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai South, EDCS K.K.Nagar, Chennai.78.
3.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Karappakkam, Near Ramachandra Hospital Chettiyar Agaram Road, Porur, Chennai.116.
[R3 impleaded as per the order dated 07.01.2014 by SMKJ in M.P.No.2 &2 of 2013 in W.P.Nos.30139 and 30243 of 2013] ... Respondents (in both W.Ps) Prayer in W.P.No.30243 of 2013 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to shift the high tension transformer erected in Plot No.9&10 in Lathif Nagar, in Old No.82, New No.111, Varadarajapuram Village, comprised in S.No.397/1C, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District to some other place.
Prayer in W.P.No.30139 of 2013 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to shift the high tension transformer erected in petitioner's property in S.No.397/1B, in No.82 Varadarajapuram Village, Kancheepuram District to some other place.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahmed (in both W.Ps) For R1 and R2 : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh Standing Counsel for [TANGEDCO] (in both W.Ps) For R3 : Dismissed vide Court order dated 15.12.2014 (in both W.Ps) COMMON ORDER The relief sought for in the present writ petitions is to direct the respondent to shift the High Tension Transformers erected in Flat No.9 and 10 in Lathif Nagar, in Old No.82, New No.111, Varadarajapuram Village, comprised in S.No.397/1C, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District to some other place.
2. The grievance of the petitioners is that, a High Tension Transformers was erected, which causes inconvenience to the petitioners. In this regard, a representation is submitted and the said representation has not considered by the respondents.
3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/ Electricity Board, made a submission that, the High Tension Transformers are erected pursuant to the orders passed by the District Collector under the provisions of Indian Telegraph Act. Thus, the Collector is the authority to consider these aspects.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the competent authority, for the purpose of redressal of their grievances in the manner known to law.
5.With these observations, these Writ Petitions stand disposed of. No costs.
SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Jeni/Nti To 1.The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Anna Salai, Chennai.
2.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai South, EDCS K.K.Nagar, Chennai.78.
3.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Karappakkam, Near Ramachandra Hospital Chettiyar Agaram Road, Porur, Chennai.116.
W.P.Nos.30243 and 30139 of 2013 kg[co] srg 02/12/2021