← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P/738/2022closed

Muniappan v. Mr.Ravichandran,

2023-03-13Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan,Honourable Mr Justice A.A.Nakkiran2 pages

Cont.P.No.738 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.03.2023 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Cont.P.No.738 of 2022 in W.P.No.5994 of 2021 Muniappan .... Petitioner -vs1.

Mr.Ravichandran The Block Development Officer, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District.

2.

The Tahsildar, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District.

3.

The District Collector, Salem District.

... Respondents (R2 & R3 suo motu impleaded vide order dated 03.01.2023) Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for having disobeyed the order in W.P.No.5994 of 2021 dated 10.03.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Yuaraj For R1 : Mr.C.Selvaraj Addl. Govt. Pleader For R2 & R3 : Mr.S.John J.Rajasingh Addl. Govt. Pleader ***** 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Cont.P.No.738 of 2022 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.

and A.A.NAKKIRAN,J.

ar

J U D G M E N T

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the 2nd Respondent has filed a Compliance Report dated 10.03.2023, wherein it has been stated that all encroachments referred to in the affidavit have been removed. Though it is pointed out by the petitioner that encroachment in respect of S.No.262/1 has not been removed, it was not the subject matter of the Writ Petition and the said issue cannot be adjudicated in this petition. It is open to the petitioner to agitate the issue pertaining to S.No.262/1 separately before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law.

2. In the result, this Contempt Petition is closed. No costs. [S.V.N,J.,] [A.A.N,J.,] 13.03.2023 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order ar Cont.P.No.738 of 2022 in W.P.No.5994 of 2021 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis