R.S. Rajashekar, v. State Rep. By Its The Deputy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 23.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.O.P.No.13091 of 2016 R.S.Rajashekar .. Petitioner Vs State rep by its 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Mylapore, Chennai-4.

2.The Inspector of Police, E-5 Pattinapakkam Police Station, Chennai.

.. Respondents Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to take action and to provide adequate police protection to install the electric motor pump in the premises at Old No. 24, New No.53, Lazarus Church Road, Mandavelipakkam, Chennai-28 in the light of the order dated 10.06.2016 made in M.P.No.210/2016 in RCOP No.401/2016 passed by the Hon'ble XVI Special Causes Court, Chennai on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 18.06.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.A.Muthalakan For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias, APP

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take action and to provide adequate police protection on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 18.06.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had lodged a complaint against his landlady K.Mala and others, in respect of a residential portion at Lazarus Church Road, Mandavelipakkam, Chennai-28 and then, the landlady had cut the basic amenities, namely, electricity and water. Therefore, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the petitioner filed RCOP.No.401 of 2016 and in MP.No.210 of 2016, the learned XVI Judge, Small Causes Court [Rent Controller] has passed an order directing the landlady to restore water connection.

4. The petitioner is also ready and willing to have the water connection restored at his cost and that the landlady is preventing the petitioner from getting water connection by obstructing his workers. In this regard, the petitioner has given a complaint dated 18.06.2016 to the 2nd respondent.

5. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is directed to go in-person and lodge a fresh complaint to the 2nd respondent along with this order and on such complaint being given, the same shall be enquired into in accordance with law and necessary protection should be afford to the petitioner for executing the orders of the Court.

With the above direction, this petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gya To 1.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, E-1, Mylapore Police Station, Mylapore, Chennai-4.

2.The Inspector of Police, E-5 Pattinapakkam Police Station, Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

1 cc to Mr.M.A.Muthalakan, Advocate, sr.34876 CRL.O.P.No.13091 of 2016 sks co kra 24.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/