← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6369/2019disposed of

Tvl.M.Palanikumar v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

2019-03-06Honourable Dr Justice Anita Sumanth3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.03.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Writ Petition Nos.6369 & 6372 of 2019 & WMP Nos.7196, 7197, 7201 & 7202 of 2019 Tvl.M.Palanikumar .. Petitioner in both W.Ps.

vs.

The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Pollachi Rural Assessment Circle, Pollachi, Coimbatore District .. Respondent in both W.Ps.

Common Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certioari to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN 33092282743/13-14 and 2014-15, dated 22.10.2018, respectively, and to quash the same. For Petitioner in both W.Ps.: Mr.S.Ramanathan For Respondent in both W.Ps : Mr.M.Hariharan, AGP (Taxes) C O M M O N O R D E R The writ petitioner has filed these writ petitions seeking the issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings in TIN.33092282743, (both) dated 22.10.2018, for the periods 201314 and 2014-15.

2. Though writ petitioner has raised some points in regard to the merits of the assessments, Mr.S.Ramanathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in both writ petitions, would only pursue and seriously canvass the violation of principles of natural justice before me. He points out that the notices issued prior to completion of assessment, dated 11.12.2017 state as follows:-

"... You may file your objections if any to the above proposal, in writing. With relevant documents in support thereof, before the undersigned, at his office within 15 days from receipt of this notice. If you wish to have a personal hearing you may appear before the undersigned at his office on the date of filing your objections. Failure to file written objection or to appear for a personal hearing within the time specified date will result in passing orders confirming the above proposals without any further intimation."

3. Mr.M.Hariharan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice on behalf of the respondent, on instructions, states that, in so far as the show cause notice calls upon the petitioner to file his objections as well as offers him an opportunity of personal hearing, the impugned proceedings are valid and the writ petitions may not be entertained.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also relies on an order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 19.12.2018 passed in Writ Petition Nos.33782 and 33785 of 2018, in similar circumstances where this Court has been pleased to direct the respondent therein to afford another opportunity of personal hearing, being of the view that the opportunity afforded at the first instance was not sufficient, upon imposition of a condition. Bearing in mind, the limited conspectus of the matter, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition finally, at the stage of admission, by consent expressed by the learned counsel appearing for both sides before me.

5. The opportunity granted by the Assessing Officer by way of the impugned order, as extracted supra, is certainly not sufficient. Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, in terms of which the present assessment has been completed, requires the Assessing Officer to furnish an opportunity of personal hearing prior to completion of assessment. In the present case, it is seen that the Assessing Officer merely calls upon the Assessee to file his written submissions and also to appear for a personal hearing on the same day of filing of written submissions.

6. This, in my view, does not satisfy the requirement of personal hearing, in so far as both parties should have complete opportunity by way of exchange of written notices and replies thereto, prior to personal hearing and adjudication of the matter.

7. It is however a fact that the petitioner has not complied with the opportunity extended for filing of objections

on 11.12.2017. In such an instance, the assessment order is set-aside, but only upon by remittance of 15% of the disputed tax liability, for each of the assessment years, by the petitioner.

8. The petitioner (in both the writ petitions) will appear before the Assessing Officer, at the first instance, on 20.03.2019 at 02.30 pm, along with proof of payment of tax and written submissions, if any. Upon satisfaction of the Assessing Officer that the order of this Court has been complied with, he shall, after hearing the petitioner, pass orders afresh, within a period of six weeks from the date of conclusion of personal hearing.

9. The writ petitions are disposed of, in the above terms. Consequently, the connected WMPs are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar srk To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Pollachi Rural Assessment Circle, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

+1 cc to Mr.S.Ramanathan, Advocate Sr.No.20637 +1 cc to The Special Government Pleader, Sr.No.21689 Writ Petition Nos.6369 & 6372 of 2019 & WMP Nos.7196, 7197, 7201 & 7202 of 2019 MR(CO) CSL/03.04.2019