Venugopal v. Pakkirisamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ S.A.NO.833 OF 2012 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2012 Venugopal ... Appellant Vs.

Pakkirisamy ... Respondent PRAYER:- The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2012 passed in A.S.No.29 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Chengalpattu, confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2011 passed in O.S.No.8 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu.

For Appellant : M/s.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondent : M/s.V.Raghavachari

J U D G M E N T

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is reported by the learned counsel for the appellant that the sole appellant died and no instruction from the side of the appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal may be dismissed as abated. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar asi https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.

The Principal Subordinate Judge, Chengalpattu.

2.

The District Munsif, Chengalpattu.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.42837 S.A.NO.833 OF 2012 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2012 AD(CO) PBS/14/09/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/