Radha Maruthamalai v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,

Crl.O.P.No.5670 of 2025 Crl.O.P.No.5670 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN,J.

This matter is posted today before this Court under the caption 'For Being Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that this Court, by an order dated 03.03.2025, has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.5670 of 2025. However in the order copy, the respondent police has been wrongly mentioned has The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District instead of The Inspector of Police, PEW Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai and the same requires to be rectified. Hence, he prayed for suitable directions. 3.

Registry is directed to carry out the necessary correction and issue order copy afresh. Further, two weeks time is extended to the petitioner to comply with the conditions.

28.03.2025 Sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.5670 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN,J.

sma Crl.O.P.No.5670 of 2025 28.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis