Mr.Paramkusam.K. v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.34846 of 2012 K.Paramkusam ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector, Chennai.

2. The Tahsildar, Egmore, Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai - 600 031.

....

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider his representation dated 15.11.2012 for omitted names of the petitioner's sisters K.Nappina and A.Sundaravalli to be incorporated in the heir certificate.

For petitioner : No appearance For respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam, Government Advocate

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 11.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (J) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The District Collector, Chennai.

2. The Tahsildar, Egmore, Nungambakkam Taluk, Chennai - 600 031.

W.P. No.34846 of 2012 aa13/01/2020 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/