M.Nalini, v. The State Rep. By Chief

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.07.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.34849 of 2012 M.Nalini .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The State rep. by Chief Secretary, Office of the Chief Minister, Puducherry.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Pondicherry.

3.M.Murugan .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to transfer the representation of the petitioner herein dated 03.12.2012 to any Independent Enquiry officer in accordance with law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to provide necessary police protection.

For Petitioner :

Mrs.V.Pushpalatha For Respondent Nos.1 & 2 :

Mr.C.T.Ramesh Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No. 3 :

Mr.A.Palaniappan

ORDER

The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to transfer the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.12.2012 to any Independent Enquiry officer and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to provide necessary police protection.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the enquiry itself was over and therefore the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. 3.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msr To 1.The Chief Secretary, Office of the Chief Minister, Puducherry.

2.The Superintendent of Police, Pondicherry.

+2ccs to M/s.V.Pushpalatha, Advocate Sr No.35188 W.P.No.34849 of 2012 GJ (CO) PR (02/09/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/