← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4888/2018disposed of

Dhanaraj, v. The District Collector,

2018-03-06Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.03.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.4888 of 2018 Dhanaraj S/o.Rangasamy Gounder .. Petitioner Vs.

1.

The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District Collectorate Complex Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer RDO's Office Tiruvannamalai Town & District.

3.The Thasildhar Taluk office Kalasapakkam Village & Taluk Tiruvannamalai District.

4.G.Lakshmanan S/o.Gurunathan 5.R.Arunachalam S/o.T.Raja 6.D.Shanthi W/o.S.Dhayalan 7.Sumathi W/o.Anbazhagan ... Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2017 requesting the 3rd respondent to cancel the illegal subdivision and inclusion of the names of respondents 4 to 7 in Patta No.206, in respect of S.No.34/7 of So.Kilnachipattu Village, Tiruvannamalai Taluk & District.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Prakash Babu For Respondents : Mr.E.Balamurugan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3

O R D E R

Mr.E.Balamurugan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Since this writ petition is being disposed of, without affecting the interest of the respondents 4 to 7, notice to those respondents is dispensed with.

2. The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the third respondent to consider his representation dated 26.12.2017, wherein and whereby, he sought for deleting the names of the respondents 4 to 7 in the Patta No.206, in respect of the property at S.No.34/7 of So.Kilnachipattu Village, Tiruvannamalai Taluk & District and to restore the Patta in the name of the petitioner, by complaining that those respondents names were wrongly included in the Patta, when the petitioner is the absolute owner of the said land.

3. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the third respondent to consider and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, only by directing the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.12.2017 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner as well as the respondents 4 to 7 and other interested parties, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the third respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS V ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar mk To 1.The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District Collectorate Complex Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer RDO's Office Tiruvannamalai Town & District.

3.The Thasildhar Taluk office Kalasapakkam Village & Taluk Tiruvannamalai District.

+ 1 cc to Mr.V.Prakash Babu Advocate,SR.17227 + 1 cc to The Govt.Pleader, SR.17756 W.P.No.4888 of 2018 nr 20/03/2018