Meena Sharma v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7714 of 2022 1 MEENA SHARMA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 SUNITHA 3 SANGEETHA DEVI Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-4, SOUNDARAPANDIYANAR POLICE STATION, PONDY BAZAAR, T. NAGAR, CHENNAI-17.

CRIME NO.56/2022.

For Petitioner : M/S. K.MANIKANDAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 380 of IPC in Crime No.56 of 2022 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioners hails from Uttar Pradesh, involved in shop theft, they were caught by the Manager of the showroom. However, before they could be handed over to the Police, they fled from the scene of occurrence.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that this Court earlier dismissed the anticipatory bail petition on the ground that the petitioners are absconding and the respondent police unable to complete the investigation.

4.In the light of the above fact, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 04/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-4, SOUNDARAPANDIYANAR POLICE STATION, PONDY BAZAAR, T. NAGAR, CHENNAI-17.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. K.MANIKANDAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.7714/2022 Date :04/04/2022 TA-12/04/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/