S.Rajkumar v. The Ombudsman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.34974 of 2012 S.Rajkumar ...

Petitioner Vs 1.The Ombudsman, Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis,s Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

2.The Chief Manager & Managing Director, Union Bank Bhavan, No.239, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021.

Maharastra, India.

3.Thiru P.Gunasekaran The Senior Manager, Union Bank of India, Previously employed at Thirupparamkundaram Branch, Thirunagar, Madurai 600 006.

.... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent by his proceedings Proc.No.F-201213006001191/2012-13 dated 14.09.2012 and quash the same and directed the 1st respondent to take the complaint preferred by this petitioner dated 24.08.2012 on the file and pass order.

For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 : Mr.T.Poornam For R2 : Mr.T.Govinda Saray Gr.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 04.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(DR CJ conf) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dpq To 1.The Ombudsman, Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis,s Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.

2.The Chief Manager & Managing Director, Union Bank Bhavan, No.239, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021.

Maharastra, India.

+1cc to M/s.T.Poornam, Advocate SR.103812 W.P. No.34974 of 2012 RK(CO) CB(30/01/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/