M.Raja v. Palaniammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.07.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN S.A.No.960 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 M.Raja ... Appellant Vs.

1.Palaniammal 2.Saroja 3.Savithri ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.06.2012 made in A.S.No.12 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Judge and Appellate Authority of the Nilgiris at Uthagamandalam confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 22.12.2010 made in O.S.No.114 of 2010 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Uthagamandalam. For Appellant :

Mr.Manogar for Mr.K.Sudalaikannu For Respondents :

Mr.N.Damodaran

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the parties have settled the dispute inter se between themselves to that effect. He has also filed a memo which stands recorded and forms part of this order.

2. The learned counsel for the respondents has also enclosed a copy of the letter addressed to him by the briefing learned counsel from Coonoor, Nilgiris District.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Recording the same, this Second Appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. * Xerox copy of the Memo of the Compromise is enclosed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar arb To:

1. The learned District Judge, The Court of the District Judge and Appellate Authority, Uthagamandalam, Nilgiris District.

2. The learned Subordinate Judge, Subordinate Judges Court, Uthagamandalam.

+1cc to Mr.N.Damodharan, Advocate, S.R.No.31322 S.A.No.960 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 AJS(CO) SU(24/09/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/