A.Krishnasamy v. Indrani

Crl.M.P.No.3570 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.10698 of 2026 SHAMIM AHMED, J.

Heard Mr.Ismath Hajaram, for Mr.J.Titus Enock, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. It appears that notice has been issued to the respondent by the Registry in pursuant to the order dated 09.03.2026. As per the Office report dated 17.06.2026, the notice has already been served on the respondent.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent either in person or through his counsel.

4.Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 516 days in filing the criminal revision petition.

5. It appears that the respondent has nothing to say either to entertain the delay condonation petition or to justify the convincing reasons to condone the delay.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SHAMIM AHMED, J .

dn

6. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 516 days in filing the above criminal revision petition is condoned. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

19.06.2026 dn Note: Office is directed to allot the regular number to Crl.R.C., and list the case for admission on 15.07.2026 Crl.M.P.No.3570 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.10698 of 2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis