Tmt Pachaymmal v. S.P.Srinivasan

S.A.No.969 of 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:23.01.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN S.A.No.969 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.Pachayammal 2.Loganathan ...Appellants Vs S.P.Srinivasan ...Respondent PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, as against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.06.2012 as made in A.S.No.2 of 2011 on the file of the Sub-Court at Bhavani in confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.08.2010 as made in O.S.No.242 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani. For Appellants :

Mr.V.B.Perumal Rai ****

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter has become infructuous and he also made endorsement to that effect. G.ARUL MURUGAN, J., https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

S.A.No.969 of 2012 mpa

2. Recording the same, this Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 23.01.2024 Index : Yes/No Speaking order/non-speaking order mpa To

1. The Sub-Court at Bhavani.

2. The Principal District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhavani. S.A.No.969 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2