Madras High CourtCONT P/154/2016closed

C.Gunasekaran v. R.Selvaraj Ias

2017-07-27Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.07.2017 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.PARTHIBAN Cont. Petition Nos.154, 316 and 331 of 2016 1.C.Gunasekaran 2.K.Anandan 3.R.Paranthaman 4.M.Muruganandam 5.S.Mahendran 6.S.Saravanan 7.K.Thirunavukkarasu 8.S.Murugesan 9.C.Thangaraj 10.V.Karnan ..

Petitioners in Cont.P.No.154 of 2016 1.J.Mansingh 2.G.Arumugam ..

Petitioners in Cont.P.No.316 of 2016 1.D.Aanuk 2.S.Vijaya Kumar 3.T.Mahimai Doss 4.P.Munisamy 5.R.Muninathan 6.C.Joseph Kumar ..

Petitioners in Cont.P.No.331 of 2016 vs.

1.R.Selvaraj, I.A.S., The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam Building, Chennai - 108.

2.Janaki Ravichandran, The Commissioner, Vellore Corporation, Vellore District.

Respondents in Cont.P.Nos.154 and The Executive Officer, Allapuram Selection Grade Town Panchayat, Vellore District now merged with Vellore Corporation rep. by Janaki Raveendran (Commissioner), Vellore Corporation, Vellore, Vellore District.

Respondent in Cont.P.No.331 of 2016 Petitions filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.No.20659 of 2010 dated 24.09.2010 and W.P.No.8138 of 2011 dated 22.08.2011.

For Petitioners ..

Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan in Cont.P.Nos.154 and 316 of 2016 Mr.P.I.Thirumoorthy in Cont.P.No.331 of 2016 For Respondents ..

Mr.S.Gunasekaran, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 in Cont.P.No.154 of 2016 Ms.P.Kavitha, Govt. Advocate for R1 in Cont.P.No.316 of 2016 Ms.P.Shanthi for R2 in Cont.P.Nos.154 and 316 of 2016 for Respondent in Cont.P.No.331 of 2016

COMMON ORDER Alleging that the order dated 24.09.2010 in W.P.No.20659 of 2010 and the order dated 22.08.2011 in W.P.No.8138 of 2011 have not been complied with, the present contempt petitions have been filed.

2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the orders of this Court have been complied with, which fact, has not been disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. Therefore, these contempt petitions stand closed. 27.07.2017 mmi

V.PARTHIBAN, J.

mmi Cont.P.Nos.154, 316 and 331 of 2016 27.07.2017