← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/5932/2025granted

M.Sathish Kumar v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

2025-03-04Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.03.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN M.Sathish Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Velankanni Police Station, Nagapattinam District.

(Crime No.64 of 2025).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.64 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.02.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.64 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 275, 123 of BNS read with Section 7, 20(1) of COTP Act & Section 52 & 59 of Food Safety Standards Act, 2006.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to be in 1/5

illegal possession banned tobacco products worth about Rs.5,000/-. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 08.02.2025 and since the contraband has been seized, the petitioner may be released on bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the case of the prosecution and submitted that petitioner has no previous case.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering, the fact that the contraband has been seized; period of incarceration; petitioner has no bad antecedents; and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

2/5

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kilvelur.

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

3/5

04.03.2025 Sma To

1. District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kilvelur.

2. The Inspector of Police, Velankanni Police Station, Nagapattinam District.

3. The Superintendent, District Prison, Nagapattinam

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

Sma 04.03.2025 5/5