P.Ragunath v. The Banking Ombudsman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.No.30770 of 2013 P. Ragunath ... Petitioner vs

1. The Banking Ombudsman, The Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-1.

2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of Mysore, Kilpauk Branch, Chennai.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose petitioners representation dated 20.8.2013 on merits thereby direct the 2nd respondent to increase No. of Installments for the payment of educational Loan for a sum of Rs.2,40,000/- availed from the 2nd respondent for persuading course of Bachelor of Engineering (B.E).

For Petitioner : Mr.Prakash Adiapadam-No appearance For R2 : Mr.V.S.Elango

O R D E R

On 26.08.2020, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 10.09.2020. When the matter was listed on 10.09.2020, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, in order to given one more opportunity to the petitioner to argue the case, the matter was directed to be listed on 15.09.2020 under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today (i.e. on 15.09.2020), when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through counsel.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Hence this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Banking Ombudsman, The Reserve Bank of India, Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-1.

2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of Mysore, Kilpauk Branch, Chennai.

W.P.No.30770 of 2013 SPD(CO) SP(12/10/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/