P.Amaresan v. Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.04.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN P.Amaresan

...Petitioner

Vs.

State Represented by The Inspector of Police, D3, K.K.Chattram Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

...Respondent

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondent Police herein not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of false complaint given by above said J.Ravi, Son of Jayaraman Naidu except by following the due process of law.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayanand For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (crl.side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the

respondent Police herein not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of false complaint given by above said J.Ravi, Son of Jayaraman Naidu except by following the due process of law. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on the basis of complaint given by one Ravi, respondent is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. Therefore, this petition.

3. In response, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, Ravi gave a complaint in connection with the property dispute. On the basis of complaint, petition enquiry in C.S.R.No.160 of 2023 is pending.

4. Considered the rival submissions and perused the records.

5. This Court, exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code normally would not interfere with the investigation conducted by a police officer. Nevertheless, it would also not

turn a blind eye to instances of harassment by the police under the guise of investigation is brought to its notice.

6. In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seek for this Court's intervention by way of a direction. The term 'harassment' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioners may not be the same to the police officer.

7. In order to meet such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a)While summoning any person named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such person through a summon/notice specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an enquiry/investigation. b) The respondent/Police is directed to serve summons mentioning the CSR number, date of complaint and the name of the complainant.

c)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station. d)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation. e)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to.

8. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

18.04.2023 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order ep

To 1.The Inspector of Police, D3, K.K.Chattram Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.

ep 18.04.2023