Madras High CourtCONT P/485/2017closed

A.Ramanathan v. Mahesh Kumar Jain

2017-06-23Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.06.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Contempt Petition No.485 of 2017 in W.P.No.4654 of 2014 1.A.Ramanathan 2.R.Ramesh 3.S.Aron 4.S.Rozario 5.Z.Syed Junaith Ahamed 6.V.Ramesh Kumar 7.N.Mahendiran 8.G.Muruganantham 9.K.Ramachandran 10.A.Jaganatha Raja 11.C.R.Soundararajan 12.V.Kubendran 13.G.Muthuselvan 14.S.Sekar 15.S.Sudalai Veerapandian 16.D.Aron 17.A.Manoharan 18.M.K.Tamil Selvan 19.S.Govindaraju 20.V.Ezhumalai 21.K.Subramanian 22.K.Ravichandran ... Petitioners Vs.

Mr.Mahesh Kumar Jain The Chairman & Managing Director, Indian Bank, Corporate Office, 254-26, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014.

... Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.4654 of 2014, dated 19.10.2016.

For Petitioners : M/s.C.Nithysh Sekhar For Respondent : Mr.Jayesh B.Dolia

ORDER

This Court, by order dated 19.10.2016 in W.P.No.4654 of 2014, has directed the respondent to consider the petitioners' representation in the light of the Circular No./HR&IR/CIR/2013-14/589/8764, dated 30.01.2014, issued by the Indian Banks' Association, and to pass appropriate orders within two weeks. Since the said order passed by this Court has not been complied with by the respondent, the present Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner.

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and on the representation of the petitioners, the respondent has passed orders vide., CO:HRM:GROUPA:2016-17, dated 20.06.2017, rejecting the claim of the petitioners.

3.Since the order of this Court has been complied with, nothing survives in the contempt petition. Accordingly, the same is closed.

However, if the

petitioners are aggrieved by the order of the respondent, they are at liberty to challenge the same, in the manner know to law.

SD/- JOINT REGISTRAR(OS)(i/c) ssv //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2017. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

SS/CO/18/07/2017 one cc to M/s.Aiyar & Dolia, Advocate SR.No.7085/17 one cc to Mr.C.Nithysh Sekar, Sr.No.7051/17