K.Krishnakumar v. D.Nagamallappa
S.A.No.490 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.N o.490 of 2018 K.Krishnakumar ... Appellant ..Vs..
D.Nagamallappa ... Respondent PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment, dated 23.03.2018 in A.S.No.42/2017 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam, reversing the decree and judgment dated 04.02.2015 in O.S.No.204/2013 on the file of the District Munsif, Sathyamanagalam.
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.Zeenath Begum
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the appellant. The counsel for the respondent is present.
2. Even though the counsel for the appellant was granted https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2
S.A.No.490 of 2018 sufficient opportunity, he did not argue the case. It is also seen from the R. HEMALATHA, J.
vum records that on several occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. Hence, the second appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
16.12.2024 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order vum To 1.The Subordinate Court, Sathyamangalam.
2. The District Munsif, Sathyamanagalam.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. S.A.N o.490 of 2018 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2