V.Annamalai v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.35334 of 2012 and M.P.No.01 of 2012 V.Annamalai ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Commissioner, Thiruvathipuram Municipality, Thiruvannamlai District.

2. The Director, Directorate of Municipality Administration, Ezhilagam- Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

.... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records comprised in the proceedings of the 1st respondent bearing Na.Ka.No.2431/2012-E1 dated 11.02.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to issue the work order in favour of the petitioner pursuant to the bid conducted by the 1st respondent in its proceedings bearing Na.Ka.No.4534/2010-E1 dated 14.02.2011. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Ravikumar

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 04.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dpq To

1. The Commissioner, Thiruvathipuram Municipality, Thiruvannamlai District.

2. The Director, Directorate of Municipality Administration, Ezhilagam- Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.104034 W.P. No.35334 of 2012 and M.P.No.01 of 2012 NR(CO) CB(31/01/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/