B.Rajasekaran, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.35359 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.01 & 02 of 2012 1.B.Rajasekaran 2.S.Balachandran 3.D.Senthilkumar ...

Petitioners Vs The District Collector, Collectorate, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

.... Respondent PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondent from closing down our fish farm at Thondamuthur Village, Coimbatore Taluk & District except in accordance with law by considering the representation dated 30.11.2012. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Ravikumar '

Government Advocate.

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 04.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dpq To The District Collector, Collectorate, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

+1cc to the Government pleader Sr.104037 W.P. No.35359 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.01 & 02 of 2012 mr[co] srg 31/01/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/