← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9293/2019disposed of

S.Immanjalien Sumathi v. The Inspector General Of Registration

2020-03-03Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.03.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.9293 of 2019 1.S. Immanjalien Sumathi 2.A. Sankaranarayanan ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.The District Registrar, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

3.The Sub Registrar, Redhills SRO Office, No.44/5, Vallalar Street, Bye-Pass, Redhills, Chennai - 600 028.

4.The Inspector of Police, Puzhal, Chennai.

5.Kuppusamy 6.Munusamy 7.Z.M. Azeez 8.Z.M. Ali Bhai 9.R. Subramanian 10.M. Manickam 11.Bhupesh Kumar 12.Sandeep Kumar ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to complete the enquiry within a time frame and cancel the sale deeds vide 1) Document No.4375 of 2001 2) Document No.4367 of 2003 3) Document No.1602 of 2007 and 4) Document No.11162 of 2007 in respect of New S.No.154/08, 154/8A3 in Old S.No.154/2 in Puzhal Village, Sembiam SRO, Madhavaram Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

For Petitioners : M/S. M.C. Swamy For Respondents : Mr. T.M. Pappiah, for R1 Special Government Pleader Mr. E. Balamurugan, for R4 Special Government Pleader M/S. M. Lalbagadur, for R5 & R6

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for the issue of writ of mandamus directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry pursuant to the representation made by the petitioner who is seeking for cancellation of sale deed. 2.

The case of the petitioners is that two sale deeds have been created by the contesting respondents and therefore a complaint has been given to the second respondent to conduct an enquiry and to pass orders. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court seeking for appropriate direction.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.

4.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief that has been sought for in this writ petition, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to conduct an enquiry based on the complaint given by the petitioner, after hearing the petitioner and respondents 5 to 12 and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation to the second respondent along with a copy of this order. The second respondent shall fix the date for enquiry and issue notice both to the petitioners as well as respondents 5 to 12.

5.

This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar AT

To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.

3. The Sub Registrar, Redhills SRO Office, No.44/5, Vallalar Street, Bye-Pass, Redhills, Chennai - 600 028.

4. The Inspector of Police, Puzhal, Chennai.

+1 CC to Mr.M.C. Swamy Advocate sr 19636.

+1 CC to Mr. Lal Bagadur, Advocate sr 99547 +1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 19237.

W.P.No.9293 of 2019 KS(CO) SP(20/05/2020)