M/S.Happy Trimming Saloon And v. The Commissioner Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.21101 of 2017 M/s Happy Trimming Saloon and Spa rep by its Proprietor S. Ganeshkumar.
... Petitioner vs
1. The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007
2. The Inspector of Police, R-3, Ashok Nagar Police Station, Chennai - 600 083.
.... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to forbear from interfering in any manner with the normal functioning of the trade carried on by the petitioner under the name and style of " M/s Happy Trimming Saloon and Spa " at New No.42, Old No.68, First Floor, Block B, 4th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 600 083.
For Petitioner : Mr.R. Sudhakar For respondents : Mr.S.N. Parthasarathy Government Advocate
O R D E R
Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents.
By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents from interfering in any manner with the normal functioning of the trade carried on by the petitioner under the name and style of " M/s Happy Trimming Saloon and Spa " at New No.42, Old No.68, First Floor, Block B, 4th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - 600 083.
3. According to the petitioner, he is running the business
as a small scale unit with requisite licence and for the customers who require herbal and ayurvedic medicines for their ailments, massage and body exercises are given by way of treatment. Further, the petitioner has stated that the business is carried on in accordance with law. The petitioner has also stated that the respondent police authority is frequently coming and interfering with the business activities and thereby, threatening for penal action for running the parlour. In order to prevent hardship, the petitioner has come forward with the present Writ Petition.
4. This court, in similar circumstances, following the ratio laid down by this court in the judgment reported in 2015(1) MLJ 308 [Masti Health and Beauty Private limited & Others V. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City], disposed of the writ petition in W.P.No.9380 of 2016, by order dated 14.03.2016, by directing the respondents-police to comply with the directions/ conditions imposed in paragraph 67 of the order in the judgment reported in 2015(1) MLJ 308 (cited supra) and further, made it clear that the petitioner therein under the guise of carrying on the business activity, shall not indulge in any unlawful or illegal activities detrimental to law and order or public order.
5. Since the issue involved in the present writ petition is identical to the issue involved in W.P.No.9380 of 2016, it is relevant to extract para 67 of the order passed in 2015(1) MLJ 308 (cited supra), which reads as follows:-
67. In the light of the above, all the writ petitions are disposed of to the following effect :
(i) The respondents shall not, as a matter of routine and without any basis, conduct any raids and interfere with the business carried on by the petitioners;
(ii) In specific cases where the police have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence punishable under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act has been or is being committed, it is open to the police to take action, after scrupulously following all the steps indicated in Section 15 of the said Act. The steps to be followed are narrated by me in paragraph 28 above; and
(iii) Based upon the laws enacted in various States of the United States of America and Singapore, which I have dealt with in paragraphs 39 to 54, the respondents may take appropriate steps for bringing in either a new legislation or a subordinate legislation in terms of the provisions of the Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act or the Chennai City Police Act, so that public order, decency and morality, which can form the basis for a regulatory law under Article 19(2) of The Constitution, are taken care of. ..."
6. In the light of the said order, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents-police to comply with the directions imposed in para 67 of the order as extracted above. It is also made clear that the petitioner under the guise of carrying on business activity shall not indulge in any unlawful or illegal activities detrimental to law and order or public order.
With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To
1. The Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007
2. The Inspector of Police, R-3, Ashok Nagar Police Station, Chennai - 600 083.
+1cc to Mr.R. Sudhakar, Advocate, S.R.No.56794 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.56479 W.P.No.21101 of 2017 MN(CO) CS/17/08/17