V.Gopinath, v. The Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.08.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.14155 of 2016 V.Gopinath ..Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai.

2.Krishnan ..Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to change the name of the patta bearing in S.No.150/1A to an extent of 0.20 cents situated at Andampallam Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District issued in favour of the 2nd respondent to the petitioner's name based on his representation made to the 1st respondent dated 20.11.2015. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Semmalai(No appearance) For Respondents :M/s.A.Srijayanthi, Spl GP for R1 Mr.Beulah John Selvaraj for R2

O R D E R

When the writ Petition was listed for hearing on 11.08.2018, none appeared on behalf of the writ petitioner. The case was listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 23.08.2018. On that day also, there was no representation on the side of the writ petitioner. In order to give one more opportunity, again the matter was listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 24.08.2018. Today (24.08.2018), when the matter was called, none appeared for the writ petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In the light of the fact that there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, it is evident that the petitioner is not willing to get along with the matter and therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To The Tahsildar, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai.

+1cc to Mr.Beulah John Selvaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.58174 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.58409 W.P.No.14155 of 2016 srg 04/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/