← Library
Madras High CourtWP/8343/2022dismissed

R.Puthuran v. The State Rep By

2026-03-03Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-03-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY R.Puthuran, S/o. Rangasamy, No. 555, Pillar Kovil Street, Nandhimangalam Village, Padiagraharam, Thiruvannamalai.

Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State rep by, The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, 2.The District Manager, District Manager Office, Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO), Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Branch Manager, Union Bank, Puthuupalayam Branch, Chengam Taluk, Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider petitioner's representation on 04.02.2022 and disburse loan to him as per nodel order No. Na.Ka.No. TAHDCO- 2020-21- LD-TM- 8 on 21.11.2020

issued by 2nd respondent under Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO) scheme within the time prescribed by this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.K.Karthik For Respondent(s):

Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate For R1 And 2.

Mr. S.Parthasarathy, For R3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.02.2022 and disburse loan to him as per nodel order No. Na.Ka.No. TAHDCO- 2020-21- LD-TM- 8 on 21.11.2020 issued by 2nd respondent under Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO) scheme, within the time prescribed by this Court.

2.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent 1 and 2 would submit that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and disposed of by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 05.05.2022 and he has also produced the said proceedings dated 05.05.2022 passed by the 2nd respondent, before this Court.

3.Upon hearing the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, it is evident that the representation of the petitioner regarding the disbursement of loan has been considered and same has been rejected by the 2nd respondent. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present case. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 05.05.2022. 4.With the above observation, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

03-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, 2.The District Manager, District Manager Office, Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO), Thiruvannamalai.

3.The Branch Manager Union Bank, Puthuupalayam Branch,

Chengam Taluk,

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.

rst 03-03-2026