Madras High CourtCRL OP/6963/2022dismissed

Karunanithi v. The State Rep By

2022-03-28Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6963 of 2022 1 KARUNANITHI [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 S.P.NATARAJAN Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VOIMEDU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.39 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.N.MANOHARAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under section 294(b). 323, 448, 427, 506(ii) of IPC @ 294(b), 323, 448, 427, 506(ii), 306 of IPC in Crime No.39 of 2022 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. This is the second anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners. As per the FIR, the case of the prosecution is that the petitioners herein have joined together and demolished the house which is the subject matter of dispute between them and deceased Bhavani. From the FIR, it appears that when these petitioners herein went to the disputed building and started conducting Boomi Pooja, the deceased Bhavani has objected the same. At that time, they have threatened the deceased Bhavani that they will demolish the house at any cost and also, only if she dies, they will be able to live peacefully.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the building of one Bhavani was erased on by the the accused persons. On seeing that, the said Bhavani consumed poison and lost her life. He further submits that the investigation is yet to be completed. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner s.

4. In view of the above submissions, this Court finds that there is no change in circumstances to reconsider the earlier petition.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 28/03/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VOIMEDU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.N.MANOHARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 4668 CRL OP.6963/2022 Date :28/03/2022 RW 31/03/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/