Sekar v. Sundaramoorthy

IN THE HIGH Court OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.11.2023

CORAM:

The Honourable MR.JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP Sekar ...Appellant / Complainant -VsSundaramoorthy

...Respondent / Accused

Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, to set aside the judgment dated 16.08.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore, in C.C.No.328 of 2007.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.Tirounavocarassou

J U D G M E N T

When the case came up for hearing on earlier occasion on 19.10.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the Appellant. The learned Counsel for the Respondent was present in Court. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption ''For Dismissal'' on 02.11.2023.

1/4

2. Despite the matter listed today, 02.11.2023 under the caption ''For Dismissal'', there is no representation for the Appellant.

3. The learned Counsel for the Respondent is present in Court.

4. Since, there is no representation for the Appellant, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the Appeal for non prosecution.

5. Accordingly, the above Criminal Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

02.11.2023 cda 2/4

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Cuddalore.

2.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.

3/4

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J., cda 02.11.2023 4/4