← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/5418/2023granted

Santhilakshmi v. State Rep By

2023-03-09Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira5 pages

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.22 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the de facto complainant N.Vaduganadhan is that the petitioner and the de facto complainant are neighbours. The de facto complainant is having ducks in his residence and he used to graze in the backyard/field of the petitioner. While so, on 05.02.2023 at about 7.00 p.m., when the de facto complainant in his residence, the accused in an inebriated condition, had picked up quarrel with the de facto complainant regarding the ducks which entered into their residence and backyard/field. When it was questioned by the de facto complainant, the petitioner's husband abused him with filthy language, attacked him with wooden log and the petitioner attacked the grandmother of the de facto complainant with hands and thereafter threatened her with dire consequences. Hence the case.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous case against her. He would also submit that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that regarding the dispute of grazing of duck, the petitioner along with her husband abused the de facto complainant and his grandmother with filthy language and brutally attacked them and also life-threatened them with dire consequences. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the FIR.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of either sides and also of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi, Thiruvarur District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card

or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

09.03.2023 arb A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

arb 09.03.2023