K.Gopinath v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.03.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH K.Gopinath Son of Kuppusamy .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

2. The State Rep. By its The Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents "not to harass the petitioner" by considering his representation dated 13.03.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Myilsamy For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohammed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents "not to harass the petitioner" by considering his representation dated 13.03.2021.

Page No.1/4

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3. Taking into consideration the fact that the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a money dispute, it is for the parties to redress the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

4. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police not to interfere with the money dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. No costs.

25.03.2021 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Page No.2/4

To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District.

2. The State Rep. By its The Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore.

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

Page No.3/4

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J., kal 25.03.2021 Page No.4/4