Madras High CourtHCP/222/2017dismissed as infructuous

Manjula, Female/Aged 46 Years v. State Of Tamil Nadu Rep.By

2017-08-21Honourable Mr Justice P. Kalaiyarasan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 21.08.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.222 of 2017 Manjula ..Petitioner/Mother of the detenue Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-7.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, to call for the entire records relating to the petitioner son's detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982 vide Detention Order dated 14.01.2017 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in proceedings BCDFGISSSV No.31/2017 quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioner's son namely Mulla @ Sivakumar, aged 22 years, S/o.C.C.Selvam, before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty from detention, now detained at Central Prison-II, Puzhal, Chennai-66.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.C.Chellappan For Respondents: Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records relating to the detention order passed in BCDFGISSSV No.31/2017 dated 14.01.2017 by the Detaining Authority against the detenu by name, Mulla @ Sivakumar, aged 22 years, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S/o.C.C.Selvam, residing at No.11603, Kannaki Nagar, Chennai97 and quash the same.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has represented that the Detention Order in question has already been revoked, by virtue of G.O.Rt.No.1017 dated 28.02.2017 and a copy of the same is submitted, wherein, it is clearly stated that the Detention Order in question has been revoked.

3. Considering the above said factual circumstances, the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous.

4. In fine, this petition is dismissed as infructuous, Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gya To 1.The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.The Joint Secretary to Government Public (L&O) Dept. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai.-9 3.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-7.

4. The Superintendent, Central Prison-II, Puzhal, Chennai-66 5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

H.C.P.No.222 of 2017 SR(CO) Eu 8.09.17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/