Boldrocchi Ecologia India v.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 19.09.2016 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER C.P.No.431 of 2014 and Company Application Nos.31 and 32 of 2015 Mrs.S.Chitra .. Petitioner vs.

M/s.Aruna Hotels Limited 144-145 Sterling Road Nungambakkam Chennai 600 034.

.. Respondent Petition filed under Sections 433(e), 433(f), 434(1)(a) and Section 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 r/w Rule 95 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 for winding up of the respondent-Company. For Petitioner : Ms.Valsala for M/s.A.K.Mylsamy & Associates For respondent : Mrs.D.Revathi Karthick

ORDER

1. A memo of settlement has been filed by the petitioner. 1.1. The petitioner's counsel says that the petitioner has received a sum of Rs.9,97,253/- [Rupees nine lakhs ninety seven thousand two hundred and fifty three only] towards full and final settlement of her claim raised in the petition from the respondentcompany.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

vj2

2. In these circumstances, counsel for the petitioner says that she has instructions, not to press the petition and the pending applications, any further.

3.

Accordingly, the company petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected applications are closed. 19.09.2016 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No vj2 C.P.No.431 of 2014