I.Jaainullabudeen v. Pandy
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.11.2017 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.RAJA Cont.P.No.621 of 2017 I.Jainullabudeen ... Petitioner Vs.
Mr.Pandy Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem-636 007.
... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, prayer to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.19175/2016, dated 08.06.2016.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
ORDER
Alleging non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.19175/2016, dated 08.06.2016, the present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.When the matter is taken up, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3.However, Mr.P.Paramasivadoss, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent/Transport Corporation submitted that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with by the respondent.
4.Recording the above said submission made by the learned Standing Counsel, the contempt petition is closed. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) ssv //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2018. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
CO/23/01/2018.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/