Ponrathi v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.7609 of 2021 Ponrathi

...Petitioner

Versus

1. The Commissioner of Police, EVR Raod, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

2.The Inspector of Police, K-1, Sembium Police Station, Perambur, Chennai - 11.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein not to Harass the petitioner and save the Petitioner herein.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents herein not to Harass the petitioner and save the Petitioner herein.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent police.

3. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a family dispute, it is for the parties to adjudicate the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

4. This writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police not to interfere with the family https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssr To

1. The Commissioner of Police, EVR Raod, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.

2. The Inspector of Police, K-1, Sembium Police Station, Perambur, Chennai - 11.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.M.Ravi, Advocate, S.R.No.18907 W.P.No.7609 of 2021 SSD(CO) GN(16/06/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/