C.Chinnasamy v. District Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH Mr.Chinnasamy

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The District Registrar, Collector Office Compound, State Bank Road, Coimabatore-18.

2.The Sub-Registrar, Sulur Sub-Registrar Office, Sulur, Coimbatore-641402.

3.M/s.Charles Dwellers Pvt.

Ltd., No.54, Mettupalayam Road, G.N.Mills Post, Coimbatore-641029.

4.The Commissioner, Karumathampatti Municipality, Somanur-641668.

Coimbatore District.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.10.2022 and to 1/5

cancel the gift deed executed by the 3rd respondent in favour of the 4th respondent bearing document No.13591/2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent within a time frame.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balasubramaniam For Respondents 1 2 & 4 : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader accepting notice for respondents 1, 2 and 4. Since this Court is directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, after giving due notice and opportunity to the third respondent, notice to the third respondent is dispensed with.

2. The petitioner and others had given a representation dated 29.10.2022 to respondents 1 and 2 seeking to cancel the gift deed executed by the 3rd respondent in favour of the 4th respondent. Since the said representation has not yet been considered, the above Writ Petition has been filed.

2/5

3. It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the official respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of The Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

4. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the first respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.10.2022, in accordance with the procedure contemplated under Section 77A of the Registration Act, after giving due opportunity to the persons, who had executed the sale deed as well as the beneficiaries and the witnesses to the deed of conveyance and any other persons, who may be interested in the subject property, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the 3/5

claim made by the petitioner and that it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the same on its own merits.

5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands ordered. No costs.

16.03.2023 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order To 1.The District Registrar, Collector Office Compound, State Bank Road, Coimabatore-18.

2.The Sub-Registrar, Sulur Sub-Registrar Office, Sulur, Coimbatore-641402.

3.The Commissioner, Karumathampatti Municipality, Somanur-641668.

Coimbatore District.

RS/hvk 4/5

M.S.RAMESH,J.

RS/hvk 16.03.2023 5/5