Madras High CourtWP/4807/2012dismissed for nonprosecution

G.Arumugham, v. The District Collector

2019-12-16Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.4807 of 2012 and MP Nos. 1 and 2 of 2013 and WMP No.6612 of 2016 G.Arumugham ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector (Land Reforms), Kancheepuram District, Collectorate, Kancheepuram.

2. The Tahsildar, Thirukkazhukundram Taluk, Taluk Office, Thirukkazhukundram Po Kancheepuram Dt.

3. The President, Mamamai Village Panchayat, Manamai Po.

Thirukazhukundram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mahabalipuram Division, Maamallapuram Po.

Kancheepuram District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Maamallapuram, Kancheepuram District.

....

Respondents 1/3

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent and quash his Order of Direction in Na.Ka.No.1643/2011/A1, dated 24.01.2012 and consequently, forbear the respondent No.3 from laying the proposed Panchayat Road in the middle of the Private Patta Ayan Punja land in S.No.62/2 (2.98 Acres) in Manamai Village, Thirukkazhukundram Taluk, Kancheepuram District. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.S. Selvam, Government Advocate, for R1, R2, R4 and R5 Mr.T.P. Saveetha for R3

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 03.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. Today, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To