← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3399/2015dismissed as infructuous

Dr. S.Sivaraja, v. The Teachers Recruitment Board

2025-02-28Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 28.02.2025 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Dr.S.Sivaraja

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The Teachers Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Member Secretary, 4th Floor E.V.K.Sampath Building, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

2.The Director of Collegiate Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The University Grants Commission, Rep. by its Chairman, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 1st respondent in Rc.No.12357/L1/2014 dated 22.01.2015 and to quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents to award weightage marks to the 1/4

petitioner for the service rendered in International University of Libyan University for the period from 24.10.2007 to 31.08.2010 (2 years and 10 months) as per Regulation 10.1 of University Grants Commission Regulations on minimum qualification for appointment of teachers in Universities and Colleges, 2010 as well as for the period from 07.12.2010 to 14.08.2011 (8 months) as well as for the period from 1998-2002 (four years) worked as Guest Lecturer at Government Arts College, Kumbakonam, drawing Government salary and from 19.06.2002 to 13.06.2006 worked as Lecturer and consequently, select and appoint the petitioner to the post of Assistant Professor of English based on such awarding of weightage marks and on merits in the selection with due seniority and other attendant benefits.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondent - 1 :

Mr.R.Siddharth, Standing Counsel For Respondent - 2 :

Mr.C.Jayaprakash, Government Advocate

ORDER

Today, when this writ petition was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought by the petitioner has become infructuous. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.

2/4

2. In view of the submission coupled with an endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

28.02.2025 mrr Index : Yes/No To 1.The Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor E.V.K.Sampath Building, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

2.The Director of Collegiate Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.

3.The Chairman, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 002.

3/4

C.SARAVANAN, J.

mrr 28.02.2025 4/4