← Library
Madras High CourtWP Crl./420/2026disposed of

D.Magesh v. State Rep By,

2026-03-11Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-03-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR D.Magesh ..Petitioner Vs

1. State Rep By, Avadi Commissionerate, Avadi, Tiruvallur.

2. The Assistant Commissioner Of P Olice Ponneri, Tiruvallur.

3. The Inspector Of Police E1, Ponneri Police Station, Ponneri, Tiruvallur.

4. Prema

5. Kumar

6. Munusamy ..Respondents To issue a Writ or appropriate writ of order or direction, particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to take action against the respondents 4 to 6 based on the representation/complaint of the petitioner dated 01.08.2025 and in accordance with law to secure the end of justice.

For Petitioner :

Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondents :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 TO R3

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to take action against respondents 4 to 6 based on the petitioner's representation/complaint dated 01.08.2025.

2. The case of the petitioner is that, being one among the 15 chit auction bidders, he had paid a substantial sum to one Prema on the advice of one Kumar. When Prema was required to return the amount to the petitioner, she kept seeking time repeatedly and thereafter, allegedly abused him. Hence, the petitioner lodged a complaint on 01.08.2025, followed by another complaint on 10.03.2025. Since no progress was made, the present petition has been filed.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that both complaints were enquired into, and the petitioner appeared before the respondent police on 06.09.2025 and gave a letter stating that no further action was required.

4. The contention of the petitioner now is that he is willing to produce materials to substantiate his claim that Prema and Kumar had received the amount from him.

5. In view of the above submissions, the petitioner is directed to produce the materials to substantiate his claim before the Ponneri Police Station. The respondent police shall consider the same, and if a cognizable offence is made out, appropriate action shall be taken in accordance with law. 6.With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

11-03-2026 nl Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order To

1. The Avadi Commissionerate, Avadi, Tiruvallur.

2. The Assistant Commissioner Of Police Ponneri, Tiruvallur.

3. The Inspector Of Police E1, Ponneri Police Station, Ponneri, Tiruvallur.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

nl 11-03-2026