Karthick v. Inspector Of Police

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.16 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused have stolen the Auto belonging to the defacto complainant. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case based on the confession statement recorded from the co-accused. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent Police would submit that the petitioner has committed theft of Auto belonging to the defacto complainant from the parking area. He would further submit that there are two previous case pending as against

the petitioner. The missing Auto is recovered and handed over to the defacto complainant. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into account the nature of offence and the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 13.03.2023 jas

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

jas 13.03.2023