Tamim Ansari v. B.Sahul Hammed

C.M.P.No.5599 of 2024in SA.SR.No.936 of 2022 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., This miscellaneous petition is filed by a purchaser, who purchased the property on 06.03.2015 at that time, suit in O.S.No.1858 of 2012 was pending before the III Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai and the same was dismissed. Challenging the same, appeal in A.S.No.257 of 2019 was preferred by the plaintiffs on the file of XVI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai and the same was also dismissed.

Challenging the same, the second appeal is preferred.

2. Pending second appeal, the purchaser/petitioner herein sought to implead himself as a respondent in the second appeal since he is a necessary party for adjudication.

3. This Courts finds that petitioner is a proper and necessary party for the adjudication and in the interest of justice, this petition is allowed.

17.04.2024 nr Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis