S.Ramasamy v. The Director Of Pension

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.03.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU and W.M.P. Nos. 8000 and 8002 of 2023 S.Ramasamy ... Petitioner -vs1. The Director of Pension Chennai.

2. The Regional Joint Director Audit Department Coimbatore.

3. The Assistant Treasury Officer SubTreasury Annur, Coimbatore.

4. The Branch Officer O/o. Accountant General (A/E) 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018.

... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Third Respondent issued in Na.Ka. No. 586/2022/A1 dated 09.11.2022 and quash the same and issue a consequential direction to the 1/6

Respondents to restore the quantum of Pension, as fixed in P09/10921663/PPO NO/854502 dated 08.02.2019 by the Fourth Respondent. For Petitioner :

Mr. R.Saseetharan For Respondents :

Mr. K.Karthick Jeganath Government Advocate

O R D E R

Heard Mr. R.Saseetharan, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. K.Karthick Jeganath, Learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the Respondents and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

2.

The Writ Petition challenges the Proceedings in Na. Ka. No. 586/ 2022/A1 dated 09.11.2022 passed by the Third Respondent in which the Petitioner has been informed that his pension has been reduced from Rs. 41,010/- to Rs. 32,410/-, with a consequential direction to the Respondents to restore the quantum of pension as fixed in Order No. P09/10921663/PPO NO/854502 dated 08.02.2019 passed by the Fourth Respondent. 2/6

3.

It is trite law that any administrative action which involves civil consequences must be made consistently with the rules of natural justice, meaning thereby that the person concerned must be informed of the case with supporting evidence against him and he must be given a fair opportunity to meet the case before an adverse decision is taken. The Government of Tamil Nadu in G.O. Ms. No. 286, Finance (Pension) Department dated 28.08.2018 after referring to the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in State of Punjab -vs- Rafiq Masih (Whitewasher) [(2015) 4 SCC 334], has issued detailed instructions providing the manner in which any excess amount paid to Government Servants/Pensioners/Family Pensioners would have to be made.

4.

There is nothing to show in the impugned order that before the excess payment claimed to have been made was effected, any show cause notice had been issued to the Petitioner calling for an explanation from him with supporting materials relied in that regard. Such incurable flaw in decision making by the Respondents is in violation of the principles of natural justice and would vitiate the impugned order. In that view of the matter, the impugned order passed by the Third Respondent is set aside leaving it open to the 3/6

concerned authorities to appropriately deal with the matter following due process. It shall be incumbent upon the concerned authorities to issue show cause notice to the Petitioner along with working-sheet of the calculation for the excess payment claimed to have been made to him and after affording full opportunity of personal hearing to him and considering each of the objections that may be raised by him, a reasoned order shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law following the procedure laid down in the instructions in G.O. Ms. No. 286, Finance (Pension) Department dated 28.08.2018 issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu, uninhibited and uninfluenced by the earlier order passed in the matter, and the decision taken shall be communicated to the Petitioner under written acknowledgement.

5.

In the event of the concerned authorities failing to initiate fresh such proceedings within 30.06.2023, any amount so far recovered from the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned order, which has been set aside, shall be refunded to the Petitioner under written acknowledgment and report of compliance in that regard shall be filed before the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

4/6

In fine, the Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. 14.03.2023 Maya Index: Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 30.05.2023.

To

1. The Director of Pension Chennai.

2. The Regional Joint Director Audit Department Coimbatore.

3. The Assistant Treasury Officer SubTreasury Annur, Coimbatore.

4. The Branch Officer O/o. Accountant General (A/E) 361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018.

Copy to The Registrar (Judicial), Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104.

5/6

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

Maya 14.03.2023 6/6