Madras High CourtA/7258/2015closed
M/S. Cholamandalam Investment v. Mr. Arun Hari Patil
2016-12-16Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam1 pages
A.No.7258 of 2015 T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Service of notice on the respondent is completed and the name of the respondent is printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation for him.
2. It is represented that the warrant has been executed and the vehicle has been seized.
3. Therefore, recording the fact that the vehicle has been seized, this application is closed. The Advocate Commissioner shall be paid an additional remuneration of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only). The warrant of commission shall stand discharged.
4. The vehicle shall not be alienated until further orders of this Court or of the Arbitrator.
16.12.2016 RS http://www.judis.nic.in