Madras High CourtWP/6394/2012dismissed

T.R.P.Chakkaravarthy v. The District Collector

2018-11-22Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.11.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.No.6394 of 2012 T.R.P.Chakkaravarthy ..

Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishangiri 635 001 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pocampalli, Krishnagiri District ..

Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent herein to cancel the earlier proceedings of the third respondent vide No.8A/112/1410 dated 18.05.2001, in view of the order made in Na.Ka.No.8906/2004/G, dated 20.12.04 of the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the third respondent to rectify the mistake of measurement of total extent of petitioner's Patta Land No.343 in Survey No.529/2A3B at Pochampalli, Nagojana Halli Village, Krishnagiri District and to implement the order dated 20.12.2004 of the 2nd respondent herein.

For Petitioner ::

No appearance For Respondents ::

Mrs.Sri Jeyanthi Spl.Govt.Pleader

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking an order of Mandamus to direct the third respondent, to cancel the earlier proceedings of the third respondent vide No.8A/112/1410 dated 18.05.2001, in view of the order made in Na.Ka.No.8906/2004/G, dated 20.12.04 of the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the third respondent to rectify the mistake of measurement of total https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

extent of petitioner's Patta Land No.343 in Survey No.529/2A3B at Pochampalli, Nagojana Halli Village, Krishnagiri District and to implement the order dated 20.12.2004 of the 2nd respondent.

2. There is no representation for the petitioner continuously. The matter had been posted under the caption 'for dismissal'.

3. The Court cannot give a direction to cancel an order. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any order, then he should seek to quash the same by calling for the records. The Writ Petition is not maintainable. It had not been admitted and the Writ Petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nvi To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri District, Krishangiri 635 001 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Pocampalli, Krishnagiri District +1 cc to the Government Pleader, High Court, Madras S.R.No.80393. W.P.No.6394 of 2012 BR(CO) SSM(10/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/