Madras High CourtCRL OP/6094/2021dismissed

S.Senthil v. State Rep By,

2021-03-26Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Sixth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6094 of 2021 S.SENTHIL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAIKARANCHATRAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CR NO.966/2020.

For Petitioner : M/S.R.SILAMBARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.KARTHIKEYAN Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

ORDER

The case has been heard through video conference The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 & 430 IPC and 21(1) of Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act 1957, in Crime No.966 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. This is the second anticipatory bail application before this Court. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 1 unit of river sand in tractor, without any valid permission, Hence, the complaint.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that this is the second anticipatory bail application before this Court and the earlier application was dismissed on 17.02.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.2957 of 2021 on the very same petitioner. He would further submit that there are two previous cases pending as against this petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and there are two previous cases pending as against this petitioner and there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 26/03/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANAIKARANCHATRAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.R.SILAMBARASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.6094/2021 Date :26/03/2021 TK/19.04.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/