The Board Of Control For v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2022 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR O.P.No.68 of 2013 In the matter of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and In the matter of Application to set aside the Award of the Arbitral Tribunal dt.03.11.2012 The Board of Control For Cricket In India Represented by its Secretary having office at Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005
...Petitioner/Counter Claimant
-Vs1.Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, No.135, Continental Building, Dr.Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai - 400018 :Respondent/Claimant 2.The Arbitral Tribunal comprising of Justice (Dr.) A.S.Anand (Retd.) (Former Chief Justice of India) "Gurukripa" C-49, Sector -14, Noida - 201301, Uttar Pradesh 3.Justice Y.K.Sabharwal (Retd) (Former Chief Justice of India) No.B-9, Maharani Marg, New Delhi - 110 065 4.Justice B.N.Srikrishna (Retd.) (Former Judge, Supreme Court of India)
No.46, Shyamala M Lotikar Marg Mattunga, Mumbai - 400 019 .Respondents Original Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the Award dated 03.11.2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to the agreement dated 12.04.2006 between the petitioner and the respondent.
This original petition coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr.Gautam S.Raman, Advocate for the petitioner herein and Mr.G.Masilamani, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr.Jose John for M/s.King and Patridge, (Law Firm) Advocate for the 1st respondent herein and upon reading the petition filed herein and both sides having submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and the learned counsel for the petitioner herein having made an endorsement on the petition stating that "The Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow the petitioner to withdraw the Arb.OP. as settled out of court", and this Court doth acceding the said request, It is ordered :- That the petition in O.P.No.68 of 2013 be and is hereby disposed of as withdrawn/closed.
2. That there shall be no order as to costs.
WITNESS THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT AT MADRAS AFORESAID, THIS THE 07TH DAY OF JUNE 2022.
Sd./- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (O.S.II) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2022. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
DL 10.06.2022 O.P.No.68 of 2013
ORDER
DATED : 07.06.2022 THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR FOR APPROVAL: 10.06.2022 APPROVED ON : 10.06.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR Original Petition No.68 of 2013 The Board of Control for Cricket in India Represented by its Secretary having office at Chepauk Chennai-600 005.
... Petitioner vs.
1. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited No.135, Continental Building Dr.Annie Besant Road Worli, Mumbai - 400 018.
2. The Arbitral Tribunal Comprising of Justice (Dr.)A.S.Anand (Retd.) (Former Chief Justice of India) "Gurukripa", C-49, Sector-14, Noida - 201301, Uttar Pradesh.
3. Justice Y.K.Sabharwal (Retd.) (Former Chief Justice of India) No.B-9, Maharani Marg, New Delhi - 110 065.
4. Justice B.N.Srikrishna (Retd.) (Former Judge, Supreme Court of India) No.46, Shyamala M Lotikar Marg Mattunga, Mumbai - 400 019.
... Respondents Original Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to set aside the award dated 03.11.2012
passed by the Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to the agreement dated 12.04.2006 between the petitioner and the respondent.
For Petitioner :
Mr.Gautam S. Raman For Respondent :
Mr.G.Masilamani Senior Counsel instructed by Mr.Jose John of M/s.King and Patridge (Law Firm) for R1 *****
O R D E R
It is submitted by both sides that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.
2. Mr.Gautam S. Raman, learned counsel on record for petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file which is as follows:
3. Request of learned counsel for petitioner acceded to.
4. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned Original Petition is disposed of as withdrawn/closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/-M.S.J.
07.06.2022 //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2022. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.