Madras High CourtWP/33100/2013dismissed for default

S.U.Peter Surendran v. Bar Council Of Tamilnadu

2018-11-14Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.11.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P. 33100 of 2013 and M.P. 1 of 2013 S.U.Peter Surendran ... Petitioner Vs Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, High Court Campus, Chennai-600 104.

... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.10.2013 and enroll the petitioner as advocate.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance

O R D E R

When the above Writ Petition was posted for hearing on 13.11.2018, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today "for dismissal". Even today, (14.11.2018) there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, other Miscellaneous Petition is also closed.

Sd/-- Assistant Registrar(CS viii) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpp To The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, High Court Campus, Chennai-600 104.

W.P. 33100 of 2013 and M.P. 1 of 2013 ASK(06/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/