T.A.Chinnasamy v. Nazhiyemuddhin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.07.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Contempt Petition No.740 of 2017 in W.P.No.32609 of 2016 Mr.T.A.Chinnasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Mr.Nazhiyemuddhin Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Forest and Environment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.Mr.Dr.N.Krishnakumar, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015.

3.Mr.Kesavan, Forest Range Officer, Palacode MSCS Range, Dharmapuri District.

4.Mr.Rajendran, District Forest Officer, Hosur MSCS Range, Dharmapuri District.

5.Mr.Gunasekaran, Forest Range Officer, Pennagaram Range Office, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District.

6.Mr.Arungoyal, Principal Accountant General of Tamil Nadu, Accounts and Entitlement, O/o.the Accountant General, Teynampet, Chennai-18.

... Respondents

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.32609 of 2016, dated 19.09.2016.

For Petitioner : Mrs.Selvirajesh For Respondents : Mr.M.Perumal, GA (For R1 to R5) Mr.V.Vijayshankar (For R6) * * * * *

ORDER

Earlier, the petitioner had filed writ petition in W.P.No.32609 of 2016 seeking to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.11.2015, to count half of service rendered by the petitioner from the date of joining in service as Plot Watcher from 01.09.1977 to 21.05.2004 on temporary basis along with regular service rendered by the petitioner as Forest Watcher from 22.05.2004 to 31.07.2015 and send the revised proposal to the 6th respondent to grant pension with all consequential pensionary benefits to the petitioner from the date of retirement and arrears with interest. 2.As the issue involved in the said writ petition was covered by the decision of this Court made in W.P.No.8205 of 2011, dated 19.04.2011, this Court allowed the writ petition on the same lines. Now, the present contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the orders passed by this Court.

3.Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents.

4.Since the order of this Court has been complied with, nothing survives in the contempt petition. Accordingly, the same is closed.

SD/- JOINT REGISTRAR(OS)(i/c) ssv //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2017. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

DK/CO/10/08/2017 one cc to the Spl. Govt.Pleader, High Court,SR.No.7874/17