Shalini v. The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the First day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4223 of 2022 IN CRL.O.P.No.3827 of 2022 SHALINI [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE STATE REP.BY [RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, W-23, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ROYAPETTAH, CHENNAI 2 B.PRIYANGA [RESPONDENT/INTERVENING PETITIONER DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT] Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time of Interim Anticipatory Bail granted to the petitioner on 10.03.2022 in Crl.O.P.No.3827 of 2022 and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and necessary under the circumstances of this case.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.SUMATHI, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.L.BASKARAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the 1st Respondent, and of MRS.K.SANTHA KUMARI, Advocate on behalf of the Intervener, the court made the following order:- The petition has been filed to extend the time of interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.3827 of 2022 dated 10.03.2022.
2. No representation on the side of the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the Intervener submits that this matter is listed today before the Honourable Apex Court in S.L.P.Crl.No.2749 of 2022.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) also submits that today this matter is listed before the Honourable Apex Court. Further, as per the order of this Court, the petitioner as well as her family members are not co-operated with the investigation.
5. Considering the above facts, it is clear that the petitioner has failed to comply with the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.3827 of 2022 dated 10.03.2022. Hence, the interim anticipatory bail granted to this petitioner is not extended.
6. At 1.45 p.m., the learned counsel for the petitioner appeared before this Court submits that the she was engaged in other Court, but already order was passed and the learned counsel for the Intervener gone out of this Court, so, the appearance of the petitioner at 1.45 p.m. is recorded.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
8. Post the main Criminal Original petition on 08.04.2022 for producing Apex Court Order Copy.
-sd/- 01/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XVIII, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE W-23, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, ROYAPETTAH, CHENNAI.
C.C. to M/S.K.SUMATHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges Order in CRL MP.4223/2022 in CRL OP.3827/2022 Date :01/04/2022 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format TA-07/04/2022